Here is the schema:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82bec/82bec3d3bd64281cba1a1b7edd73e679d69ad8a8" alt=""
Red is the entity, green properties, yellow classes etc, from this I was able to map different vocabularies for most of the entities, properties and classes; see here:
Interestingly I couldn't find a entity of either a 'question' or an 'answer' - I thought these might be sub properties or classes of a entity but could
not find it.
Found some interesting art related ontology's here:
http://dlib.york.ac.uk/ontologies/Openart/index.html
http://linkedevents.org/ontology#sec-namespace
Which were taken from here:
http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Feb-12/FebMar12_Allinson.html
What is interesting is the degree of sophistication that is permissible in some spaces and not others, think we'll need to create 'community art' as a ontological term as none that I can see come near to it - Fro instance when looking at the FOAF ontology I was interested to see this property
http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_myersBriggs
Which has 16 personality classifications which can be used to describe a person -
No comments:
Post a Comment